Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Pope to Canonize Terrorist Marxist Bishop and Marxism

Enrique Angelelli: a disquieting beatification despite a dubious background and with an ideological stale smell.
 
(Rome) It had already become apparent and some had feared that the Argentine Bishop Angelelli would be beatified. The train of dubious canonizations continues unabated.



On October 17, the new substitute of the Cardinal Secretary of State, the Vatican diplomat and Archbishop Edgar Peña, signed a letter (Protocol No. 423.517) as one of his first acts, appointing Msgr. Marcelo Colombo, emeritus bishop of La Rioja, the date for the beatification of Bishop Enrico Angelelli Carletti, former Bishop of La Rioja.
"It is my pleasure to inform you that the Holy Father grants that the celebration of the beatification rite of the Reverend Servant of God, Enrico Angelelli Carletti, Bishop of La Rioja, will take place in this city on Saturday, April 27, 2019. "
The Pope will not attend in person, but will be represented by Cardinal Angelo Becciu, Prefect of the Congregation of the Congregation of the Causes of Peña, as a substitute in the State Secretariat.

Who was Bishop Enrico Angelelli Carletti?


Beatification of Angelelli
Bishop Angelelli was a representative of Marxist liberation theology, who had had friendly contacts with the Communist Eastern Bloc since the 1950s, particularly the Pax Movement, which infiltrated the Catholic Church on behalf of the regime. Since the 60s, he was closely associated with the left-wing terrorist movement Montoneros. The Montoneros were part of left-wing extremism that was radicalizing and seeking a violent seizure of power in Argentina, as was attempted in many Latin American countries by communist revolutionary movements with Soviet and Cuban support. The result was terror and counter-terror, with - this is an Argentine feature - right and left Peronists faced each other as enemies. When terror threatened to overthrow the country, the military intervened to restore order, as the generals declared in 1961.
 
Not only did the dubious left-wing orientation make Angelelli a controversial Church leader during his lifetime, he was described a contemporary pamphlet:
"Anyone who thinks like a Marxist and speaks like a Marxist is also a Marxist!"

Doubtful circumstances of death

Doubtful are the circumstances of his death. Officially, he died in a tragic traffic accident, most likely due to a mistake made by his companion, another liberation theologian and priest belonging to the left-wing Third World Priestly movement supported by Angelelli. His passenger said that he could no longer remember the accident. He quit the priesthood shortly thereafter.

"Who thinks and speaks like a Marxist is also a Marxist"
Several years after the death of Angelelli, another Marxist priest, the Capuchin Antonio Puigjané, suddenly declared that the bishop had actually been assassinated. The order was given by the then military dictatorship. Since then, he has been diligently elaborating on the myth of the murdered "Bishop of the Poor."
 
Puigjané himself hit the headlines as a left-wing terrorist, as he wanted to topple even then in 1988, five years after the end of the military dictatorship, the already democratic government of Raul Alfonsin.
 
There were no lack of circles in Argentina and in Western Europe, inside and outside the Church, who willingly jumped on this unusual move and indignantly denounced any involvement of the hated military regime as fact, although no evidence could be presented for such a daring assertion. None of the eyewitnesses of the accident and at the accident testified to anything like this.
 
Under quite different political auspices - meanwhile, in Argentina, under the moderate left-wing Peronists - the case of the traffic accident was reopened 38 years later and two leading military figures were convicted without concrete evidence, as the principals of an assassination attempt. In the same period, the ex-Capuchin Puigjané was pardoned prematurely, although his terrorist attack had cost eleven lives.
 
The issue is still controversial in Argentina. Critics speak of a political process, which served less the truth, but to the settling of old scores (see to Angelelli, the situation in Argentina and left myths: The Unequal "Martyrs" ).

Did Angelelli die in odium fidei?

However, whether a traffic accident or assassination, neither in one case or the other are there indications that the death of Angelelli occurred in odium fidei. But hatred of faith is a prerequisite for recognizing a death brought on as a martyrdom for Christ.

Angelelli, a leftist taboo
After Francis had declared Pope John XXIII. an unmiraculous saint, no less doubtfully, he declared the death of Bishop Angelelli an assassination and the bishop as a martyr. The recognition of his death as martyrdom shortens namely the lengthy path of the beatification process, since no miracle is needed.
 
With the miraculous beatification of Bishop Angelelli by an event, whether a traffic accident or assassination, which is reinterpreted to be a martyrdom, Pope Francis is creating a new, questionable category of "political martyrs."
 
Last August, another Argentine archbishop, Msgr. Hector Aguer, broke the Angelelli taboo . He asked why not a contemporary of Angelelli, the Catholic intellectual Carlos Alberto Sacheri, to be beatified, who really became a victim of terrorism, but of Marxist terrorism. Sacheri was executed in front of his own children. He had previously pointed out and criticized the Communist infiltration of the Catholic Church with a book.
 
But in this, the political left is always blind. Meanwhile, the Church leadership seems to have become blind.
 
What conclusion can be drawn from Pope Francis' unusual approach?

Probably only one: The confirmation of a long-standing suspicion that the obstinate, Argentine Pope wants to canonise a disturbing, highly politicized and long-overstated direction in the Church, the alliance between Christianity and socialism, historically compromised by Soviet dictatorships, terrorism, hostility towards the Church, denunciations, abortion ... Should we list more?

Text: Andreas Becker
Image: InfoCatolica
Trans: Tancred vekron99@hotmail.com
AMDG 

11 comments:

JBQ said...

This is where "the rubber meets the road". It started with Roncalli, was abetted by Montini, pushed off the road by Wotiya, and put back on track by Bergoglio. Bergoglio believes in Liberation Theology and violent revolution. This was the warning of the Third Secret. The problem is that JPII witnessed the world utopia first hand. He was not exactly thrilled with the results that he saw whether it was the German type or Soviet dream.

Peter W said...

Another hysterical beat up that's not working.

Tancred said...

Another infantile outburst of hysterics from the gay commie crowd.

Peter W said...

The more you publish idiots like Nardi, Becker and like minded hair brains, the more you set yourself up for untold disappointment and ultimately, grief.

Tancred said...


How is Nardi an idiot? You accuse him of drug use, of being stupid and so on, but out of the literally dozens of times I ask for an explanation, you disappear only to come back the next week, or the next day, sometimes within the hour to make another unqualified insult or easily refuted charge.

You’re the insipid pansy whose actions get him in trouble. I’ll bet your real-life is full of you opening your mouth and inserting your foot...

Anonymous said...


The goal is to set a precedent for Canonizations so that any Tom, Dick or Harry or even Trannys can now be Canonized.

This is not about Bishop Angelelli it is to set a precedent for future Canonizations so no display of Heroic Virtues, Miracles or Holiness is needed. It is another attempt to waterdown and destroy the Faith.

Peter W said...

It's probably well past the time for the centralized process of canonizations to be scrapped. It has devolved into a scandalous situation whereby money, ideology, partisan vested interests often manipulate the process in order to sacralize unworthy motives and dodgy causes.

It's time to reclaim the ancient custom of local acclamation and leave it at that. It worked a treat for centuries until money and politics abducted it and took it hostage.


As for Nardi's 'journalism', he comes from the same stable as Magister, di Mattei in Italy who distort facts and present personal opinion as objective reporting. These three and their like minded colleagues are profoundly lacking in historical perspective and theological literacy. They are essentially hacks who perpetuate the ancient imperial roman custom of bread and circuses for the fickle. They are not in the least interested in sound thinking and deep analysis of issues but rather opt for the easy path of infantile niggling, innuendo, gossip and sheer dissemblance. Pentin of the NCRegister is the same.

Their like minded pals on this side of the pond are people like Weigel, Ensolen, Rutler, Royal, Murray etc and lesser fry like Longenecker and the vagrant cleric Zuhlsdorf.

Not one of these characters would stand a chance defending their positions convincingly in the company of the informed.

Tancred said...

You still haven’t demonstrated any of your assertions, and they all have readership far in excess of you and your effeminate friends.

De Mattei can put 10s of thousands of people on the street at Pro-Life and Pro-Familia Marches. Can any of your friends do that for feminist and pro-sodomy marches?

Tancred said...

Not only that, but Father Zuhlsdorf is incardinated in Madison, so you’re also badly informed there.

Peter W said...

The vagrant Zuhlsdorf is incardinated into the Italian diocese of Villetri-Segni for which he was 'ordained' after fleeing the USA following two expulsions from seminaries. He's made a cottage industry out of rationalizing and reinventing himself as some sort of restorationist messiah. Zuhlsdorf is an opportunist and entrepreneur pure and simple. When Morlino cashes in his commission, Zuhlsdorf will be off seeking another 'extraordinay Ordinary.'

As for De Mattei, he couldn't organize a poultry raffle. He might manage a salon gathering of Vaticanese gossips, pimps and tattle talers.

Tancred said...

Do you have any evidence that Morlino is “cashing in”. As much as it pains you, Madison is where he is employed, regularly saying Mass.

Are you endorsing Saint Paul Seminary?

I knew the priest who precipitated Zuhlsdorf being disincardinated from Saint Paul. Nobody told us why he was disciplined. It was suggested that he engaged in Litirgical abuses, but then, a lot of the clergy in that diocese are habitual liturgical abusers, so that doesn’t wash.

De Mattei indeed does organize March for Life in Italy. Do you have any evidence of individuals who engage in prostitution participating in those “salons”. Perhaps you’re thinking of Bergoglio’s meeting with Katy Perry?

http://m.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/images-from-romes-march-for-life

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...