By David Martin
Among other things, Benedict says in
the book that the renunciation of all things is a criterion for entering the
priesthood, pointing out that from the first century "men could only
receive the sacrament of Holy Orders if they had committed themselves to sexual
abstinence."
It was reported Tuesday that
Benedict XVI has requested of Ignatius Press, the English publisher of the
book, that he be removed as co-author. In comments to the Italian news agency ANSA, Benedict XVI’s confidant
and personal secretary, Archbishop Georg Gänswein, said he has "acted on
instructions from the pope emeritus and asked Cardinal Robert Sarah to contact
the book’s publisher and request that they remove Benedict XVI’s name as
co-author of the book, and remove his signature from the introduction and
conclusion."
Whether this request comes from
Benedict XVI or Ganswein was pressured into saying this remains to be seen, but
there is no question that the liberal Vatican bureaucracy is behind this move
to remove Benedict as co-author. According to Bishop Athanasius Schneider,
Cardinal Sarah’s intervention in getting this book published “has provoked, so
to speak, the anger of hell.”
Critics of the book say it
"opposes” Pope Francis by raising "specter of a parallel
magisterium" when in fact the book upholds the true Magisterium against
Francis' counter-magisterium.
What is certain is that Benedict XVI
previously approved the book. Cardinal Sarah, who heads the Vatican Congregation for Divine Worship,
issued a statement Tuesday confirming Benedict's foreknowledge and approval of
the book. Therein he states: "After various exchanges in view of the
development of the book, on November 19, I finally sent a manuscript, the cover,
a common introduction and conclusion, the text of Benedict XVI and my own
text."
The cardinal adds: "On November 25, the Pope Emeritus expressed his great
satisfaction with the texts written in common, and he added the following: ‘For
my part, I agree that the text should be published in the form you have
foreseen.’”
This sharply contradicts Archbishop Ganswein's statement to ANSA, in which he
says that Benedict "did not approve a project for a co-authored book, and
that he had not seen or authorized the cover."
Ignatius Press has stood by the
co-authorship and cover. In a statement released Tuesday, Mark Brumley,
President of Ignatius Press, said: "Ignatius Press published the text as
we received it from the French publisher Fayard. Fayard is the publisher with
whom we have collaborated on three other Cardinal Sarah titles. The text we
received indicates the two authors are Benedict XVI and Cardinal Sarah. That
text also indicates that Benedict XVI co-authored an introduction and a
conclusion with Cardinal Sarah, as well as his own chapter on the priesthood,
wherein he describes how his exchanges with Cardinal Sarah gave him the
strength to complete what would have gone unfinished.”
Continuing, he says: "Given that, according to Benedict XVI’s correspondence
and Cardinal Sarah’s statement, the two men collaborated on this book for
several months, that none of the essays have appeared elsewhere, and that a
joint work as defined by the Chicago Manual of Style is ‘a work prepared
by two or more authors with the intention that their contribution be merged
into inseparable or interdependent parts of a unitary whole,’ Ignatius Press
considers this a coauthored publication.”
"Cardinal Sarah indicates the content of the book remains unchanged,"
the statement concludes. "That content, as noted, includes a coauthored
introduction, a chapter by Benedict XVI, and a conclusion coauthored by
Benedict XVI and Cardinal Sarah."
Hence there is no question that
Cardinal Sarah has spoken truthfully about Benedict's approval and
co-authorship of the book, but the question remains as to whether or not
Benedict truly denied his co-authorship. Did Benedict XVI shrink or did Ganswein
fabricate this concerning him? It appears that the same iron-clad Vatican
bureaucracy that forced Benedict's "resignation" in 2013 has now coerced
Ganswein into lying to ANSA about Benedict.
We'll never know for sure until we
hear it from the horse's mouth, but will we? The thing that would embolden the
enemy to advance such a lie would be the foreknowledge that Benedict will no
longer be able to speak about this himself, i.e. that he might be drugged or
kept under surveillance. Recent photos of Benedict XVI show that he appears
rather dazed.
The other possibility is that Pope Benedict
might come forward himself to clarify this latest report. For this we pray, and
especially, we pray he assertively go on record as co-authoring this fine book
in defense of Catholic truth.
