tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post4123345137569098420..comments2024-03-28T02:22:35.857-07:00Comments on The Eponymous Flower: Benedict XVI: Interfering in the Divorce Debate "Nonsense"Tancredhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16015531337154301560noreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-42145754374775601502014-12-26T22:01:50.068-08:002014-12-26T22:01:50.068-08:00My name is Jennifer martins, from USA I never beli...My name is Jennifer martins, from USA I never believed in love spells or magic until i met this spell caster once when i went to Africa in February this year on a business summit. I meant a man who’s name is DR.madurai he is really powerful and could help cast spells to bring back one’s gone, lost, misbehaving lover and magic money spell or spell for a good job or luck spell .I’m now happy & a living testimony cos the man i had wanted to marry left me 3 weeks before our wedding and my life was upside down cos our relationship has been on for 6years. I really loved him, but his mother was against us and he had no good paying job. So when i met this spell caster, i told him what happened and explained the situation of things to him. At first i was undecided, skeptical and doubtful, but i just gave it a try. And in 7 days when i returned to usa, my boyfriend (now husband) called me by himself and came to me apologizing that everything had been settled with his mom and family and he got a new job interview so we should get married. I didn’t believe it cos the spell caster only asked for my name and my boyfriends name and all i wanted him to do. Well we are happily married now and we are expecting our little kid, and my husband also got the new job and our lives became much better. His email is maduraitemple@yahoo.com :or call +2347067607073Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16474296558525117051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-46059842175864429062014-12-18T16:40:09.036-08:002014-12-18T16:40:09.036-08:00Also, I didn't say every SV denies Baptism of ...Also, I didn't say every SV denies Baptism of Desire. I said that SV's, like protestants, are divided amongst each other on important doctrines critical to Salvation. SV's have accused other SV's of being apostates for believing in Baptism of Desire. A litany of other examples can be found from disputes arising from the Dimond Bros, Siri Thesis, SSPV/CMRI, "pope" Michael, and the Palmarian Catholic Church who are Thuc-line.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-38326878925738518582014-12-18T16:30:24.443-08:002014-12-18T16:30:24.443-08:00"Who cares how many priests the CMRI have? Je..."Who cares how many priests the CMRI have? Jesus only had 12 apostles, what is your point?"<br /><br />After Christ ordained those 12 apostles He told them to go forth and preach the Gospel. On Pentecost Sunday 3000 people converted, conversions kept multiplying and by 300 A.D there was 6 million Catholics in the midst of violent persecution. God has always blessed His favoured religious orders, especially those in crisis periods, with a rise in vocations. In fact vocations are a sure sign of spiritual virility. While Traditionalist orders like the FSSPX, FSSP, and FFI have flourished the CMRI has been barren like an elderly maidens womb. The CMRI resembles protestantism in it's fruits; after the protestant revolution roughly 9 million people left the Church and that number stayed stagnate for hundreds of years. In contrast the Catholic Church quickly regained ~10 million people in Mexico after the Our Lady of Guadalupe apparitions in the 16th century. Roman Catholic history is full of examples like this - The Roman Church is the missionary Church therefore it is always distinguished from heretical sects based on it's fruits in the missionary field. Even if heretics see brief victory (e.g. Protestant revolution, Arian heresy, et. al.), they are soon overshadowed by the Truth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-25486368064711739682014-12-17T09:12:04.888-08:002014-12-17T09:12:04.888-08:00Who cares how many priests the CMRI have? Jesus on...Who cares how many priests the CMRI have? Jesus only had 12 apostles, what is your point? Numbers and popularity aren't necessary for truth.Obama was voted in twice as president.Does this make him a moral good leader? The difference is Obama wouldn't deny his positions.You however equate popularity with truth.Thats in direct with the bible that talks about the fewness of the saved.Sedevacantists believe as the church once believed,and worshipped the catholics used to worship.If we were wrong then you are wrong now.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-28972866312110965412014-12-17T09:07:18.771-08:002014-12-17T09:07:18.771-08:00The Thuc consecration's are indeed valid.In fa...The Thuc consecration's are indeed valid.In fact,I have seen the SSPV rebuke and it's false.It wasn't his fault some of his candidates went full blown apostate posthumously.Thuc was a valid bishop concecrated during Pius XI reign.JP2 was a full blown apostate that broke the 1st & 8th commandments regular with events like ASSISI 1 & 2.The novus ordo goes against the council of Trent and violated Quo Primum.Paul VI and the novus ordo are responsible for the abomination of desolation.Not every sedevacantist denies baptism of desire, where are you getting your info,bro?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-66130688688862211482014-12-16T19:33:47.769-08:002014-12-16T19:33:47.769-08:00Sorry, but you're clearly blinded by demons. I...Sorry, but you're clearly blinded by demons. I suggest going to an Ignatian retreat because you're arguing from emotion and not from logic and reason. You ignored all the evidence in my post and offered no substantial rebuttal.<br /><br />John XXIII healed a nun named Sister Caterina 5 years before the first SV thesis was published. If you read the link I posted, you would see that this is a medical miracle that wasn't explained by science. John XXIII was beatified based on this miracle.<br /><br />St. Francis did not predict a black pope, I just debunked that entire theory while citing an authoritative source, please re-read that post again. <br /><br />Thuc consecrations are not valid what so ever. This is a video from a SV priest showing why they were invalid; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKWkBlBgHio<br /><br />Thuc preformed no miracles and his works on earth resulted in really bad fruits, again please read the following: http://papastronsay.blogspot.ca/search/label/Sedevacantism<br /><br />Also your views on the end times are identical to protestantism. Protestants also believe that the Catholic Church apostatized and their particular sect kept the true faith. Like protestantism, SVism is not the One, Holy, Apostolic, Universal, and Visible Church. SVism is invisible, it is .000003% of the world population. It is not One because, like protestants, SV's are divided amongst each other on critical doctrine (Baptism of Desire, etc.). They are not Apostolic because Thuc consecrations are invalid. They are not Catholic (Universal) because most SV's live in protestant USA. They are not Holy because none of the SV founders have preformed miracles after their death.<br /><br />Also the CMRI has almost no vocations. The CMRI was founded roughly at the same time as the FSSPX, the CMRI has roughly 30+ priests while the FSSPX has roughly 600. The FSSP is 20 years younger than the CMRI and they have roughly 230 priests. <br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-3144695686267679832014-12-16T12:44:49.187-08:002014-12-16T12:44:49.187-08:00Archbishop Thuc (spell check typo)Archbishop Thuc (spell check typo)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-56161218124196632772014-12-16T12:41:50.155-08:002014-12-16T12:41:50.155-08:00John XXIII did not perform a miracle,that's wh...John XXIII did not perform a miracle,that's why his canonization was such a bizarre joke.Yes St.Francis did predict a black pope of sorts.Archbishop Thick did something miraculous.He kept the true catholic clergy going for the younger generations by concecrating bishop in the pre-june 1968 rite.The true catholic church is now a remnant, just as the bible predicted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-84754455840093896512014-12-13T11:24:36.401-08:002014-12-13T11:24:36.401-08:00Oh and one more thing! God does not approve of sed...Oh and one more thing! God does not approve of sedevacantism. Bishop des Lauriers worked no miracles after his death. Archbishop Thuc worked no miracles after his death. Fr Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga worked no miracles after his death. If God approved of this theory, He would have sent a deceased sedevacantist leader to preform an extraordinary miracle.<br /><br />God lent His support to Pope John XXIII by granting through his intercession an extraordinary miracle, the healing of Sister Caterina.<br />The miracle was instant and extraordinary. The miracle took place 25 May, 1966. The miracle was recorded 5 years before the Sedevacantist theory was first published. The miracle was accompanied by a vision of Pope John XXIII dressed as a Pope.<br />God could not permit that miracle if John XXIII was not Pope.<br />On the weight of evidence there is Divine support to affirm that Pope John XXIII was a true Pope. God has raised him in glory and works wonders for him.<br /><br />http://papastronsay.blogspot.ca/search/label/Sedevacantism<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-7716262466888832792014-12-13T11:14:03.265-08:002014-12-13T11:14:03.265-08:00You haven't read history, you've only read...You haven't read history, you've only read SV propaganda on the internet. The fact that you believe in the St. Francis prophecy shows you know nothing about historical research and checking sources.<br /><br />The so called St. Francis prophecy was a forgery by a heretical group called the Spirituals.<br /><br />After St. Bonaventure's death, the Franciscan order was divided and chaotic. The Spirituals accused the Franciscan order of betraying their rule and the Church at large for abandoning the Gospel. After certain controversies with Rome, under St. Celestine V's reign they were actually given permission to do what they wanted without interference. When he resigned, Boniface VIII was elected and papal opposition to their order was renewed and they were excommunicated. They in turn rejected his rise to the papal throne as uncanonical. From his election through the papacy of John XXII, who condemned their heresy that absolute poverty was necessary for sanctity and that the Church could not own property (and who they called a heretic and antichrist).<br /><br /> "Mark of Lisbon and others think that this prophecy received its accomplishment in the great schism which desolated the Church after the election of Urban VI in the year 1378." (Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis Of Assisi, Washbourne, 1882.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-42282823749194195532014-12-12T03:23:38.499-08:002014-12-12T03:23:38.499-08:00Yes, I have his books the Jesuits and Windswept Ho...Yes, I have his books the Jesuits and Windswept House.<br /><br />Great books I also have most all his interviews Fr. Martin knew what he was talking about and as you rightly point out we are living it!<br /><br />This is another interview given by Fr. Martin where he talks about the New World Order wanting to make a Pope to resign.<br /><br />Malachi Martin & Michael Corbin 1996/1997 <br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gunEmPcv3sIAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-38615516589175036432014-12-11T00:45:43.243-08:002014-12-11T00:45:43.243-08:00The World has his Masters who rule everything, eve...The World has his Masters who rule everything, even inside the church, am I to add anything more explicit about the real curia' lobbies, guess you can understand. Have God mercy on alll of us. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-70395000843476550932014-12-10T18:07:00.704-08:002014-12-10T18:07:00.704-08:00Ratzinger as Pope was a mistake. He may have the b...Ratzinger as Pope was a mistake. He may have the brains but lacks the personality. He comes across like such a whiny and weak man that no wonder he had no real control over the Curia... and the World just hated/ignored him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-50345121802044117112014-12-10T16:57:34.374-08:002014-12-10T16:57:34.374-08:00I have read catholic history.Have you ever read Ca...I have read catholic history.Have you ever read Cajetan or St.Robert Bellarmine?Their writings advocate sedevacantistism. Saints have done and said many things,it doesn't mean they're G-d.St.Francis of Assisi predicted a black Pope that would turn on the Church.Going by your logic,we must recognize even the antichrist if he is 'Pope'.The fact is since 1958, every 'Pope' has been antichrist in their writings,actions, or both.There have been over 40 anti-pope's in history.This is nothing new so I am not sweating the current crisis.We have valid priest's,bishop's,sacraments,masses,nor do we need to ever set foot in a novus ordo church.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-35149060797314694352014-12-10T16:33:38.248-08:002014-12-10T16:33:38.248-08:00"How can you recognize a Pope you disobey?Tha..."How can you recognize a Pope you disobey?That would be blatant apostasy."<br /><br />Our obedience to the Pope or any other superior is never absolute. Nobody can be bound by an immoral command or compelled to believe a false doctrine. Our absolute obedience is owed to God alone - the Pope is not God.<br /><br />Sometimes there might be a price for fidelity, even the penalty of excommunication, but I would rather be excommunicated for doing what is right or believing what is true, than face the judgment seat of Christ knowing that I had chosen the will of a man in preference to Him. But even if one were to suffer such penalty unjustly in this life, that would not mean that the Pope wasn't the Pope - just that he was a bad one.<br /><br />If that Pope had been elected invalidly by those suffering the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae, however, then the SV position might have merit - it may prove so yet. It would need a man with oodles of integrity to judge his own election to be invalid though, and for some reason Jorge Bergoglio does not strike me as being that sort of man.Deacon Augustinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03549825303646357455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-3820872513578790802014-12-10T16:00:01.494-08:002014-12-10T16:00:01.494-08:00"How can you recognize a Pope you disobey?Tha..."How can you recognize a Pope you disobey?That would be blatant apostasy."<br /><br />Have you ever heard of St. Athanasius? Was he an apostate for disobeying a pope he recognized? There's a multitude of Saints and Catholics who disobeyed a pope which they recognized. To say the contrary only proves you're unread and ignorant of Catholic history and dogma.<br /><br />For some reason the USA, the home of SV's and neo-con Catholics, is plagued with papolatry. I'm guessing it's a reaction to being surrounded by every sect of protestantism imaginable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-70825127762233593622014-12-10T12:21:23.965-08:002014-12-10T12:21:23.965-08:00Ever hear of the Great Apostasy?How can you recogn...Ever hear of the Great Apostasy?How can you recognize a Pope you disobey?That would be blatant apostasy.The catholic church is preserved in a remnant of catholics who keep the faith preserved and free from the heresies of vatican 2.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-45547449121159146522014-12-10T11:24:46.600-08:002014-12-10T11:24:46.600-08:00He probably thinks that an extended period of sede...He probably thinks that an extended period of sede vacante would mean that Christ's promises to the Church had failed.<br /><br />I am quite comfortable with the fact that a heretic can be a Pope and the seat not be empty. It has happened plenty of times before. My problem with the SV position is that it relies on an extreme form of ultramontanism and so is just the flipside of conservative novo ordoism.Deacon Augustinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03549825303646357455noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-44086454981009482992014-12-10T09:03:10.840-08:002014-12-10T09:03:10.840-08:00Recently a novus ordo kicked me off his blog becau...Recently a novus ordo kicked me off his blog because I hold the sedevacantist position.I went out of my way to be polite, respectful, nor did I condemn anyone.He would respond to my statements, which are fact based and polite,with insults, threats,and anger.How is this crisis going to resolved if we can't even have a polite conversation? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-5575293572334943682014-12-10T08:59:02.934-08:002014-12-10T08:59:02.934-08:00Because catholics like my priest and parish hold f...Because catholics like my priest and parish hold fast to the tradition handed down by the apostles. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-62218323764740899992014-12-10T08:44:06.132-08:002014-12-10T08:44:06.132-08:00No, you are not alone. I'd say that is the gen...No, you are not alone. I'd say that is the general consensus even among the enemies of the Church.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-89932364725104162232014-12-10T08:39:23.532-08:002014-12-10T08:39:23.532-08:00Popes come and go,good popes and bad popes, the Ch...Popes come and go,good popes and bad popes, the Church is still here after 2000 years, ask yourself why?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-72474869791587578672014-12-10T07:52:15.306-08:002014-12-10T07:52:15.306-08:00Am I the only here who holds the view of not havin...Am I the only here who holds the view of not having a true pope since 1958?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-37929380082661491712014-12-10T07:44:43.908-08:002014-12-10T07:44:43.908-08:00aaaaaand, a most interesting read on the topic.......aaaaaand, a most interesting read on the topic....<br /><br />http://www.pewsitter.com/view_news_id_190601.php<br /><br />If the writer is correct, again Benedict, lay it all out...give a live interview and name names. Disinfect the wound so the puss can be expelled and healing can actually begin.<br /><br />susannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404498638452030181.post-77417254716918314512014-12-10T07:31:48.749-08:002014-12-10T07:31:48.749-08:00"Benedict makes an uncertain sound and then d..."Benedict makes an uncertain sound and then denies that it was a sound at all."<br /><br />Quote of the day.susannoreply@blogger.com